“If the organisation
is independent, as India says, can an international organisation hold any kind
of event in Delhi without government permission?” Rizvi asked.
He made the remarks
on Saturday morning at a discussion organised by the Dhaka University White
Panel and the University Teachers Association of Bangladesh (UTAB) at the Nawab
Nawab Ali Chowdhury Senate Building, marking the second anniversary of the 2024
mass uprising.
Rizvi said an
international organisation recently arranged an event in Delhi where a
“fugitive fascist” was given an opportunity to speak. He said both the BNP and
Bangladesh government had protested the matter.
According to Rizvi,
the Indian government has said the organisation concerned is independent and
therefore the government has nothing to do with the event.
He questioned
whether such a position was acceptable.
“If a foreign
individual or organisation could be stopped from carrying out activities in India
or Bangladesh during the previous government, why is the Indian government now
saying it has nothing to do with an event where a fugitive fascist was allowed
to speak?” he asked.
Rizvi referred to
the case of British lawyer Lord Carlile, who came from London during the Sheikh
Hasina government to represent BNP Chairperson Khaleda Zia in legal
proceedings.
He claimed Carlile
was not allowed to enter Bangladesh and was also denied an opportunity to hold
a press conference in Delhi.
Rizvi described
India’s current position as a “double standard” and said the issue was a matter
of concern for the BNP.
On foreign policy,
he said Bangladesh should maintain friendly relations with other countries but
should not accept the dominance of any foreign power.
“Friendship will
remain in our foreign policy, but we will not accept the supremacy of any
country,” he said.
Rizvi said the July
uprising was not the movement of any particular individual or group but a mass
uprising driven by the sacrifices of ordinary people.
He claimed that 15
to 20 rickshaw pullers and 95 workers were among those killed during the
movement.
“This was a massive
uprising of the people as a whole,” he said.
According to Rizvi,
the July uprising was the culmination of 17 years of continuous movements and
public grievances against injustice, repression and foreign influence.
He said
Bangladesh’s people had historically resisted aggression and colonial influence
and that the July uprising represented the latest manifestation of that
resistance.
Rizvi also called
for careful examination of those who now speak in softer tones about the
previous government or suggest that the country was better off under Sheikh
Hasina.
Referring to a
recent exhibition at the residence of the Jamaat-e-Islami amir, Rizvi said
photographs of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s March 7 speech, the Liberation War and
the July uprising were displayed there.
However, he claimed
that there were no photographs, statements or posters of a key figure of the
Liberation War whom he described as a freedom fighter and the declarer of
independence.
Rizvi said the
absence was significant and warranted further analysis.
He also questioned
whether recent calls to improve relations with India and forgive the Awami
League after August 5 could be linked to the current political situation.
He stressed that the sacrifices of July, the history of the Liberation War and Bangladesh’s sovereignty should not be viewed separately.

Saturday, August 8, 2026
Published Date : August 8, 2026
